# MedusaJs vs sentry

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MedusaJs | sentry |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 27 in E-commerce | #1 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 36 997 | 45 678 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +546 | +839 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 22 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.22.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | 26.10.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

MedusaJs scores 83/100 against 80/100 for sentry, so it is the safer default.

sentry ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for MedusaJs.

## Details

- [MedusaJs](https://selfhost.directory/project/medusajs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/medusajs.md)
- [sentry](https://selfhost.directory/project/sentry) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sentry.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/medusajs-vs-sentry