# MedusaJs vs SeaweedFS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MedusaJs | SeaweedFS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 27 in E-commerce | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 36 989 ✓ | 35 794 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +538 | +833 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 28 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.22.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

MedusaJs scores 83/100 against 81/100 for SeaweedFS, so it is the safer default.

SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for MedusaJs.

If you want the quickest setup, SeaweedFS is easier to run; MedusaJs needs more configuration.

## Details

- [MedusaJs](https://selfhost.directory/project/medusajs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/medusajs.md)
- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/medusajs-vs-seaweedfs