MedusaJsvsryot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MedusaJs | ryot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 27 in E-commerce | #4 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 36 988 | 3 648 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +537 | +42 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 2 |
| Latest release | v2.22.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v10.5.0 · 22 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
MedusaJs scores 83/100 against 63/100 for ryot, so it is the safer default.
MedusaJs ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for ryot.
If you want the quickest setup, ryot is easier to run; MedusaJs needs more configuration.
MedusaJs is growing faster right now (+537 stars in 30 days).
MedusaJs details →ryot details →
Swap a project
Keep MedusaJs, compare it with
Keep ryot, compare it with