# MedusaJs vs quackback

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MedusaJs | quackback |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 27 in E-commerce | #9 of 14 in Customer Support |
| GitHub stars | 36 988 ✓ | 331 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +548 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 15 |
| Latest release | v2.22.1 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.14.1 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

MedusaJs scores 83/100 against 50/100 for quackback, so it is the safer default.

MedusaJs ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for quackback.

If you want the quickest setup, quackback is easier to run; MedusaJs needs more configuration.

MedusaJs is growing faster right now (+548 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MedusaJs](https://selfhost.directory/project/medusajs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/medusajs.md)
- [quackback](https://selfhost.directory/project/quackback) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/quackback.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/medusajs-vs-quackback