MedusaJsvsqdrant
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MedusaJs | qdrant | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 27 in E-commerce | #1 of 5 in Vector Database |
| GitHub stars | 36 990 | 35 304 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +539 | +501 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 14 |
| Latest release | v2.22.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v1.20.0 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
MedusaJs scores 83/100 against 82/100 for qdrant, so it is the safer default.
MedusaJs ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for qdrant.
If you want the quickest setup, qdrant is easier to run; MedusaJs needs more configuration.
MedusaJs details →qdrant details →
Swap a project
Keep MedusaJs, compare it with
Keep qdrant, compare it with