# MedusaJs vs Project N.O.M.A.D.

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MedusaJs | Project N.O.M.A.D. |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 27 in E-commerce | #1 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 36 989 | 41 170 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +538 | +2 819 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | v2.22.1 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.35.1 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Project N.O.M.A.D. scores 85/100 against 83/100 for MedusaJs, so it is the safer default.

MedusaJs ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for Project N.O.M.A.D..

If you want the quickest setup, Project N.O.M.A.D. is easier to run; MedusaJs needs more configuration.

Project N.O.M.A.D. is growing faster right now (+2 819 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MedusaJs](https://selfhost.directory/project/medusajs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/medusajs.md)
- [Project N.O.M.A.D.](https://selfhost.directory/project/project-n-o-m-a-d) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/project-n-o-m-a-d.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/medusajs-vs-project-n-o-m-a-d