# MedusaJs vs OpenEMR

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MedusaJs | OpenEMR |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 27 in E-commerce | #1 of 5 in Healthcare |
| GitHub stars | 36 989 ✓ | 5 555 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +538 ✓ | +87 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v2.22.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v8_5_0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

MedusaJs scores 83/100 against 72/100 for OpenEMR, so it is the safer default.

MedusaJs ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for OpenEMR.

MedusaJs is growing faster right now (+538 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MedusaJs](https://selfhost.directory/project/medusajs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/medusajs.md)
- [OpenEMR](https://selfhost.directory/project/openemr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openemr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/medusajs-vs-openemr