MedusaJsvsOctoBot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MedusaJs | OctoBot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 27 in E-commerce | #6 of 42 in Cryptocurrency |
| GitHub stars | 36 988 | 6 873 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +548 | +266 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 5 |
| Latest release | v2.22.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | 2.1.1 · 30 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
MedusaJs scores 83/100 against 69/100 for OctoBot, so it is the safer default.
MedusaJs ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for OctoBot.
If you want the quickest setup, OctoBot is easier to run; MedusaJs needs more configuration.
MedusaJs is growing faster right now (+548 stars in 30 days).
MedusaJs details →OctoBot details →
Swap a project
Keep MedusaJs, compare it with
Keep OctoBot, compare it with