MedusaJsvsNightscout
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MedusaJs | Nightscout | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 27 in E-commerce | #2 of 31 in Health & Fitness |
| GitHub stars | 36 988 | 2 852 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +548 | +23 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 6 |
| Latest release | v2.22.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v15.0.9 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
MedusaJs scores 83/100 against 67/100 for Nightscout, so it is the safer default.
MedusaJs ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Nightscout.
If you want the quickest setup, Nightscout is easier to run; MedusaJs needs more configuration.
MedusaJs is growing faster right now (+548 stars in 30 days).
MedusaJs details →Nightscout details →
Swap a project
Keep MedusaJs, compare it with
Keep Nightscout, compare it with