mediastormvsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| mediastorm | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #44 of 54 in Media Streaming | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 143 | 35 794 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +869 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 28 |
| Latest release | androidtv-native-latest · 27 Oct 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 45/100 for mediastorm, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for mediastorm.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+869 stars in 30 days).
mediastorm details →SeaweedFS details →
Swap a project
Keep mediastorm, compare it with
Keep SeaweedFS, compare it with