# Mediary Scout vs OmniVoice-Studio

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Mediary Scout | OmniVoice-Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 94/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #28 of 142 in Media Management | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 1 596 | 93 082 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +58 141 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 35 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2026.10.29 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | 0BSD | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 59/100 for Mediary Scout, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Mediary Scout.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 141 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Mediary Scout](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediary-scout) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediary-scout.md)
- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediary-scout-vs-omnivoice-studio