# MediaMTX vs zookeeper

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaMTX | zookeeper |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 20 540 ✓ | 12 825 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +288 ✓ | +14 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 73/100 for zookeeper, so it is the safer default.

MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; zookeeper needs more configuration.

MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+288 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)
- [zookeeper](https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediamtx-vs-zookeeper