# MediaMTX vs Zero-K

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaMTX | Zero-K |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #2 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 20 539 ✓ | 877 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +287 ✓ | +26 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Lua |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 62/100 for Zero-K, so it is the safer default.

MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zero-K.

MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+287 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)
- [Zero-K](https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-k) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-k.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediamtx-vs-zero-k