# MediaMTX vs wyoming-openwakeword

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaMTX | wyoming-openwakeword |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #7 of 11 in Voice Assistants |
| GitHub stars | 20 538 ✓ | 207 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +302 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.1.0 · 30 Oct 2025 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 45/100 for wyoming-openwakeword, so it is the safer default.

MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for wyoming-openwakeword.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; wyoming-openwakeword needs more configuration.

MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+302 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)
- [wyoming-openwakeword](https://selfhost.directory/project/wyoming-openwakeword) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wyoming-openwakeword.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediamtx-vs-wyoming-openwakeword