MediaMTXvsWhirl
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MediaMTX | Whirl | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #23 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 20 544 | 510 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +292 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 52/100 for Whirl, so it is the safer default.
MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Whirl.
If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; Whirl needs more configuration.
MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+292 stars in 30 days).
MediaMTX details →Whirl details →
Swap a project
Keep MediaMTX, compare it with
Keep Whirl, compare it with