# MediaMTX vs Wazuh

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaMTX | Wazuh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 20 538 ✓ | 17 478 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +302 | +493 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.14.9 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

Wazuh scores 80/100 against 79/100 for MediaMTX, so it is the safer default.

MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Wazuh.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; Wazuh needs more configuration.

## Details

- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)
- [Wazuh](https://selfhost.directory/project/wazuh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wazuh.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediamtx-vs-wazuh