# MediaMTX vs Wakupator

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaMTX | Wakupator |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 43/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #11 of 22 in Home Server |
| GitHub stars | 20 540 ✓ | 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +288 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.2.0 · 6 Feb 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | C |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 43/100 for Wakupator, so it is the safer default.

MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Wakupator.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; Wakupator needs more configuration.

MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+288 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)
- [Wakupator](https://selfhost.directory/project/wakupator) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wakupator.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediamtx-vs-wakupator