# MediaMTX vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaMTX | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 20 539 ✓ | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +303 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Go | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; UUSEC WAF needs more configuration.

MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+303 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediamtx-vs-uusec-waf