# MediaMTX vs Urocissa

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaMTX | Urocissa |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #11 of 19 in Photo Galleries |
| GitHub stars | 20 539 ✓ | 300 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +303 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 18 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | 3.4.2 · 21 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 48/100 for Urocissa, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; Urocissa needs more configuration.

MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+303 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)
- [Urocissa](https://selfhost.directory/project/urocissa) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urocissa.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediamtx-vs-urocissa