# MediaMTX vs uMap

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaMTX | uMap |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #3 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 20 538 ✓ | 1 628 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +302 ✓ | +25 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 12 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | 3.8.1 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 64/100 for uMap, so it is the safer default.

MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for uMap.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; uMap needs more configuration.

MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+302 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)
- [uMap](https://selfhost.directory/project/umap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediamtx-vs-umap