# MediaMTX vs Umami

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaMTX | Umami |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #1 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 20 542 | 39 770 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +290 | +774 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 13 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.4.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Umami scores 85/100 against 79/100 for MediaMTX, so it is the safer default.

MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for Umami.

Umami is growing faster right now (+774 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)
- [Umami](https://selfhost.directory/project/umami) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umami.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediamtx-vs-umami