# MediaMTX vs Tuleap

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaMTX | Tuleap |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #11 of 45 in Project Management |
| GitHub stars | 20 539 ✓ | — |
| Stars, last 30 days | +287 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | — |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 64/100 for Tuleap, so it is the safer default.

MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Tuleap.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; Tuleap needs more configuration.

MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+287 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)
- [Tuleap](https://selfhost.directory/project/tuleap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tuleap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediamtx-vs-tuleap