# MediaMTX vs torqvoice

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaMTX | torqvoice |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 42/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #4 of 5 in Vehicle Management |
| GitHub stars | 20 539 ✓ | 45 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +287 ✓ | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 22 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.2.64 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 42/100 for torqvoice, so it is the safer default.

torqvoice ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for MediaMTX.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; torqvoice needs more configuration.

MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+287 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)
- [torqvoice](https://selfhost.directory/project/torqvoice) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/torqvoice.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediamtx-vs-torqvoice