# MediaMTX vs tapflow

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaMTX | tapflow |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #4 of 10 in Testing |
| GitHub stars | 20 540 ✓ | 1 377 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +288 ✓ | +7 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 | v0.30.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 55/100 for tapflow, so it is the safer default.

MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for tapflow.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; tapflow needs more configuration.

MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+288 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)
- [tapflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/tapflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tapflow.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediamtx-vs-tapflow