MediaMTXvssupabase-automated-self-host
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MediaMTX | supabase-automated-self-host | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #13 of 15 in Backend as a Service |
| GitHub stars | 20 539 | 506 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +303 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 48/100 for supabase-automated-self-host, so it is the safer default.
MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for supabase-automated-self-host.
If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; supabase-automated-self-host needs more configuration.
MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+303 stars in 30 days).
MediaMTX details →supabase-automated-self-host details →
Swap a project
Keep MediaMTX, compare it with
Keep supabase-automated-self-host, compare it with