# MediaMTX vs storj

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaMTX | storj |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #4 of 7 in Distributed Storage |
| GitHub stars | 20 540 ✓ | 3 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +288 ✓ | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 39 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.165.6 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 61/100 for storj, so it is the safer default.

storj ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for MediaMTX.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; storj needs more configuration.

MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+288 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)
- [storj](https://selfhost.directory/project/storj) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/storj.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediamtx-vs-storj