# MediaMTX vs Standard Notes

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaMTX | Standard Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #8 of 81 in Notes & Editors |
| GitHub stars | 20 539 ✓ | 6 685 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +303 ✓ | +53 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | @standardnotes/mobile@3.202.11 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 70/100 for Standard Notes, so it is the safer default.

MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Standard Notes.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; Standard Notes needs more configuration.

MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+303 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)
- [Standard Notes](https://selfhost.directory/project/standard-notes) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/standard-notes.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediamtx-vs-standard-notes