# MediaMTX vs SonarQube

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaMTX | SonarQube |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #2 of 10 in Code Review |
| GitHub stars | 20 540 ✓ | 11 123 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +288 ✓ | +101 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 12 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 71/100 for SonarQube, so it is the safer default.

MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for SonarQube.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; SonarQube needs more configuration.

MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+288 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)
- [SonarQube](https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarqube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarqube.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediamtx-vs-sonarqube