# MediaMTX vs scm-manager

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaMTX | scm-manager |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #10 of 14 in Code Hosting |
| GitHub stars | 20 544 ✓ | 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +292 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | 3.11.4 · 11 Feb 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 53/100 for scm-manager, so it is the safer default.

MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for scm-manager.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; scm-manager needs more configuration.

MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+292 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)
- [scm-manager](https://selfhost.directory/project/scm-manager) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scm-manager.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediamtx-vs-scm-manager