# MediaMTX vs scanopy

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaMTX | scanopy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #1 of 10 in Network |
| GitHub stars | 20 539 ✓ | 5 915 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +303 ✓ | +121 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 41 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 | v0.19.4 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 64/100 for scanopy, so it is the safer default.

scanopy ships more often: 41 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for MediaMTX.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; scanopy needs more configuration.

MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+303 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)
- [scanopy](https://selfhost.directory/project/scanopy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scanopy.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediamtx-vs-scanopy