# MediaMTX vs sapphire

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaMTX | sapphire |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #34 of 120 in AI Assistant |
| GitHub stars | 20 549 ✓ | 321 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +297 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.13.1 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 51/100 for sapphire, so it is the safer default.

MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for sapphire.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; sapphire needs more configuration.

MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+297 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)
- [sapphire](https://selfhost.directory/project/sapphire) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sapphire.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediamtx-vs-sapphire