# MediaMTX vs rpi-mqtt-monitor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaMTX | rpi-mqtt-monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 20 540 ✓ | 328 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +288 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | 1.4.3 · 18 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 51/100 for rpi-mqtt-monitor, so it is the safer default.

MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for rpi-mqtt-monitor.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; rpi-mqtt-monitor needs more configuration.

MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+288 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)
- [rpi-mqtt-monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/rpi-mqtt-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rpi-mqtt-monitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediamtx-vs-rpi-mqtt-monitor