# MediaMTX vs Rainbond

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaMTX | Rainbond |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #2 of 10 in PaaS |
| GitHub stars | 20 549 ✓ | 6 285 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +297 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 | v6.10.1-release · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 64/100 for Rainbond, so it is the safer default.

MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Rainbond.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; Rainbond needs more configuration.

MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+297 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)
- [Rainbond](https://selfhost.directory/project/rainbond) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rainbond.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediamtx-vs-rainbond