# MediaMTX vs R2R

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaMTX | R2R |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #6 of 7 in RAG |
| GitHub stars | 20 544 ✓ | 8 049 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +292 ✓ | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 59/100 for R2R, so it is the safer default.

MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for R2R.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; R2R needs more configuration.

MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+292 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)
- [R2R](https://selfhost.directory/project/r2r) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/r2r.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediamtx-vs-r2r