# MediaMTX vs qm-music

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaMTX | qm-music |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 20 539 ✓ | 588 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +303 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.

MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for qm-music.

MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+303 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)
- [qm-music](https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediamtx-vs-qm-music