# MediaMTX vs QFieldCloud

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaMTX | QFieldCloud |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #4 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 20 542 ✓ | 246 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +290 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v26.29 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 54/100 for QFieldCloud, so it is the safer default.

MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for QFieldCloud.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; QFieldCloud needs more configuration.

MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+290 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)
- [QFieldCloud](https://selfhost.directory/project/qfieldcloud) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qfieldcloud.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediamtx-vs-qfieldcloud