MediaMTXvsPterodactyl
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MediaMTX | Pterodactyl | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #5 of 62 in Game Servers |
| GitHub stars | 20 539 | 9 437 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +303 | +183 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.15.2 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 75/100 for Pterodactyl, so it is the safer default.
MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Pterodactyl.
If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; Pterodactyl needs more configuration.
MediaMTX details →Pterodactyl details →
Swap a project
Keep MediaMTX, compare it with
Keep Pterodactyl, compare it with