# MediaMTX vs ProxMenux

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaMTX | ProxMenux |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #2 of 15 in Backup Management |
| GitHub stars | 20 537 ✓ | 3 242 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +301 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.2.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 62/100 for ProxMenux, so it is the safer default.

MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for ProxMenux.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; ProxMenux needs more configuration.

MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+301 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)
- [ProxMenux](https://selfhost.directory/project/proxmenux) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/proxmenux.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediamtx-vs-proxmenux