# MediaMTX vs PowerSync Service

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaMTX | PowerSync Service |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #35 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 20 547 ✓ | 397 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +295 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.27.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 49/100 for PowerSync Service, so it is the safer default.

MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for PowerSync Service.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; PowerSync Service needs more configuration.

MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+295 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)
- [PowerSync Service](https://selfhost.directory/project/powersync-service) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/powersync-service.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediamtx-vs-powersync-service