# MediaMTX vs PostHog

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaMTX | PostHog |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #1 of 27 in Analytics |
| GitHub stars | 20 542 | 40 508 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +290 | +589 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 3536 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 | agent-skills-v0.3926.0 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

PostHog scores 81/100 against 79/100 for MediaMTX, so it is the safer default.

PostHog ships more often: 3536 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for MediaMTX.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; PostHog needs more configuration.

PostHog is growing faster right now (+589 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)
- [PostHog](https://selfhost.directory/project/posthog) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/posthog.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediamtx-vs-posthog