# MediaMTX vs polar

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaMTX | polar |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #1 of 13 in Billing |
| GitHub stars | 20 544 ✓ | 10 436 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +292 ✓ | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | @polar-sh/cli@3.0.0 · 16 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 71/100 for polar, so it is the safer default.

MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for polar.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; polar needs more configuration.

## Details

- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)
- [polar](https://selfhost.directory/project/polar) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/polar.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediamtx-vs-polar