# MediaMTX vs penpot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaMTX | penpot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 84/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #1 of 30 in Collaboration |
| GitHub stars | 20 542 | 61 824 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +290 | +1 482 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 12 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 | 2.18.5 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Clojure |

## Which one should you pick?

penpot scores 84/100 against 79/100 for MediaMTX, so it is the safer default.

MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for penpot.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; penpot needs more configuration.

penpot is growing faster right now (+1 482 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)
- [penpot](https://selfhost.directory/project/penpot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/penpot.md)

## Related comparisons

- [OpenDesign vs penpot](https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-design-vs-penpot)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediamtx-vs-penpot