MediaMTXvsOperant
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MediaMTX | Operant | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #169 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 20 547 | 446 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +295 | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 | desktop-candidate-2026-09-28-08e65ea · 28 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 39/100 for Operant, so it is the safer default.
MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Operant.
If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; Operant needs more configuration.
MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+295 stars in 30 days).
MediaMTX details →Operant details →
Swap a project
Keep MediaMTX, compare it with
Keep Operant, compare it with