# MediaMTX vs openvox

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaMTX | openvox |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #5 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 20 544 ✓ | 199 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +292 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 17 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 | 8.31.2 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 53/100 for openvox, so it is the safer default.

MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for openvox.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; openvox needs more configuration.

MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+292 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)
- [openvox](https://selfhost.directory/project/openvox) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openvox.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediamtx-vs-openvox