# MediaMTX vs opencut

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaMTX | opencut |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #2 of 12 in Video |
| GitHub stars | 20 538 | 96 664 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +302 | +6 109 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | ffmpeg-8.1.3-1 · 24 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 75/100 for opencut, so it is the safer default.

MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for opencut.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; opencut needs more configuration.

opencut is growing faster right now (+6 109 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)
- [opencut](https://selfhost.directory/project/opencut) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/opencut.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediamtx-vs-opencut