# MediaMTX vs octelium

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaMTX | octelium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #22 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 20 544 ✓ | 4 134 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +292 ✓ | +64 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 21 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 | v0.47.0 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 59/100 for octelium, so it is the safer default.

octelium ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for MediaMTX.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; octelium needs more configuration.

MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+292 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)
- [octelium](https://selfhost.directory/project/octelium) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octelium.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediamtx-vs-octelium