# MediaMTX vs Nomad

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaMTX | Nomad |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 20 538 ✓ | 17 047 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +302 ✓ | +78 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 | ent-changelog-1.10.18 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 76/100 for Nomad, so it is the safer default.

Nomad ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for MediaMTX.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; Nomad needs more configuration.

MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+302 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)
- [Nomad](https://selfhost.directory/project/nomad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nomad.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediamtx-vs-nomad