# MediaMTX vs Nightingale

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaMTX | Nightingale |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 58/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #15 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 20 540 ✓ | 1 522 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +288 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.3.0 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 58/100 for Nightingale, so it is the safer default.

MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Nightingale.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; Nightingale needs more configuration.

MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+288 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)
- [Nightingale](https://selfhost.directory/project/nightingale) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nightingale.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediamtx-vs-nightingale