# MediaMTX vs Nezha

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaMTX | Nezha |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #15 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 20 537 ✓ | 10 377 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +301 ✓ | +45 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 40 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 | v2.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | WTFPL |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 72/100 for Nezha, so it is the safer default.

Nezha ships more often: 40 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for MediaMTX.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; Nezha needs more configuration.

MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+301 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)
- [Nezha](https://selfhost.directory/project/nezha) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nezha.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediamtx-vs-nezha