# MediaMTX vs namer

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaMTX | namer |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #19 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 20 537 ✓ | 332 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +301 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.19.20 · 25 May 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 49/100 for namer, so it is the safer default.

MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for namer.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; namer needs more configuration.

MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+301 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)
- [namer](https://selfhost.directory/project/namer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/namer.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediamtx-vs-namer